Thursday, February 28, 2008

Latest Wanda Sykes....

According to Wanda, she's not happy with Hillary citing Saturday Night Live in the debate...(again, I'm paraphrasing):

"I just hope they don't put 'To Kill a Mockingbird' on television. I can see Hillary's advisors: 'Oooh, tell them he raped you, that'll work!'"

On McCain and his mother:

"Wait, his mother is alive? What are they, vampires?"

On steroids in baseball:

"I'm sick of watching games that are 1-0 in the 8th inning....They should have a Steroid Hall of Fame. Wouldn't you like to see a guy throw a 300 mph curve ball and have his heart explode? I mean, I'd pay to see Barry Bonds little testicle..."

God, I love Wanda Sykes.

The brilliant Wanda Sykes...

If you didn't watch it tonight (2-28-2008), you really should have watched Wanda Sykes on Leno, explaining her vote for Obama and her worries for an Obama administration (and please know that I'm paraphrasing here):

"I just don't want them to try to change the rules on him if he wins. I don't want them to say 'Oh, it's Thursday. The President always takes out the trash on Thursdays.' Or "No, you don't get to fly on Air Force One. You get a bus pass.'"

Jay Leno was literally crying.

More on a variety of topics (tonight's "Lost" episode, Top Gun and the election, and other topics) soon...if not tomorrow.

Monday, February 18, 2008

My (admittedly) twisted theory on why Mike Huckabee is staying in the race...



Mike Huckabee - former Baptist minister turned Arkansas governor, guitar player (evidently the group "Boston" wants him to stop playing "More than a Feeling"), and Don Quixote-esque Republican candidate for President.

That last point begs the question - why exactly is Mike Huckabee still running for President, when John McCain has the nomination statistically clinched? I have a couple ideas on this that are somewhat predictable and normal, and then one idea that may sound crazy, but does have some logical merit (regardless of how demented it may be). First, the normal 3 reasons:

1. He's positioning himself to be a strong Vice-Presidential candidate. Everyone knows that John McCain is struggling to win over religious/social conservatives. Mike Huckabee might be thinking: "Hey, I've been winning in the south and with Evangelical voters nationwide - maybe if I stay in this race and pick up some more delegates, McCain may pick me for VP!" Now this idea is somewhat ludicrous on his face - but it offers a plausible reason why Huckabee is winning despite having no hope of gaining the nomination.

2. He's positioning himself for 2012. It's never to early to think about your next campaign -perhaps Huckabee is trying to build those grassroot networks and that name recognition that could make him a force for the nomination in 4 years.

3. He's increasing his lecture circuit fees. This past week, Huckabee honored a prior commitment and spoke for a fee at a conference in the Cayman islands. This is, essentially, his career - he's a paid public speaker. What better way to increase your honorariums than to be on morning talk shows, political news magazines, and print media as still being a candidate for President?

Okay, all of those are normal, or at the very least borderline rationale reasons for staying in the race (despite having no mathematical possibility of gaining the nomination). Now, here is my one somewhat sick and demented reason:

4. John McCain is 72 years old. Earlier in this campaign, Huckabee surrogate/supporter Chuck Norris explicitly mentioned John McCain's age as a problem - namely that he was too old and could essentially die at any minute (god forbid) to be our nation's President. Now, I don't think for a second that John McCain is too old to be President - frankly, the man has more energy than many people I know that are half his age, and I would never bet against a man who A) survived torture in a Viet Cong prison and B) who has a 90-something year old mother who is travelling with him on the campaign trail. He quite simply has the genes, energy, good health and fortitude to live to be 100.

But still. He is 72. And here's Huckabee. He knows that with a few more delegates (39, according to MSNBC's latest count) he will surpass Mitt Romney officially as #2 in the GOP in terms of delegates. He's running a shoe-string budgeted campaign where contributions continue to flow-in, and he has minimal (if any) expenditures going out. The press/pop culturalists love him (see the hilarious brawl between Conan O'Brien, Jon Stewart, and Steven Colbert over who "created" Huckabee, or Huckabee's almost daily morning interviews on MSNBC's Morning Joe), and staying in the race helps him (as noted above) with possibly becoming the VP, becoming a frontrunner in 2012, and upping his speaking fees. And he has nothing else to do.
So with all of those factors telling him to stay in the race, John McCain's age is the icing on the cake. Imagine, for a brief (horrible) moment that the worst were to happen, and in the upcoming six-and-a-half months until the Republican National Convention (September 1-4, 2008), John McCain for some reason was unable to continue as the Republican nominee.
To my knowledge, there is no provision for who takes over the nomination in such a circumstance - but certainly given the pre-modern media history of conventions, I'd wager a guess that the nomination would come out of a brokered convention. GOP delegates would have a battle and debate over who could best represent the party in the absence of their selected nominee, looking at party elders, governors, senators and others for possible candidates. It's likely many Republicans would throw their hat into the ring. And certainly the candidates who had already run in 2008 would be interested in securing the nomination they could not win in primaries and caucuses against McCain.
And who would be the favorite to be the nominee in those circumstances, provided he picks up 39 more delegates and surpasses Romney for #2? That's right - Mike Huckabee.
So see - there is a reason for Huckabee to stay in this race....at least until he picks up 39 more delegates.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Direct from the home office in Chicago, IL...it's LEGAL POP!

You're probably wondering why you're here, reading this blog. I am wondering the same thing - why are you here reading this? And more importantly, why am I writing this?

I cannot answer the former question, but I can try my hand at the latter, and in the process, explain what this blog is about. Thus, my list of reasons why I'm writing this blog:

1. I've always wanted to be a writer. But not in the typical sense that most people mean - I've never really fashioned myself a novelist or playwright or "creative" writer. My "heroes" as far as writers go are almost universally columnists - George Will, Chuck Klosterman, Gregg Easterbrook, Bill Simmons, Peggy Noonan, Malcolm Gladwell and Robert Samuelson. Even historically-speaking, it's writers like Thomas Paine (arguably the most historically significant/important columnist or pamphleteer ever), James Madison, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson who inspire me - not the artistic writers who create the new, but the writers who form and shape and reflect public opinion by writing columns or pamphlets. I've written letters to the editor, a one-time guest column for my college paper, and a few columns for my law school paper (here, here, and here), but nothing regular. So here is my chance to regularly weigh in on whatever I want, which brings us to...

2. I need to organize my thoughts. Writing is cathartic for many people - for me, it's how I sort throught the separate threads of thought flitting through my head and compile them into some sort of recognizable whole. I'm a lawyer (more on that in a moment), and when you're writing a brief, it is rare that you ever find a precedent in a case that speaks exactly to the issues of your case. What you do is take precedent from many old cases, and conform it into a coherent argument for your case - in other words, taking isolated thoughts and musings and organize them into one powerful argument. So writing helps me clarify, and realize where I stand/what I think. And I suppose it is somewhat important to know what you think.

3. Someone else might be interested in my opinions. This is probably the least significant reason, but I'd be dishonest if I said I didn't care if anyone read this - I want people to read this, think about things that I'm thinking about, and give me feedback. After all, ideas aren't valuable if they just stick in your head - they need to get out there into the old "marketplace of ideas," right?

4. I'm not just a lawyer. I love the law, and I love my job, but I'm not just a lawyer - I have tons of interests outside of my career. And this blog allows me to discuss them. I can write about politics, I can write about televisions shows (and I will be writing about "Lost"), I can write about movies, I can write about music, I can write about food, I can write about sports...basically, this blog allows me to use writing as an escape from my career. Now, that isn't to say that law will not be a topic - of course it will. But only when I'm interested in it....law on my time, not my work's time.

5. I don't get to converse with my friends (and probable readers) about serious topics nearly enough. And so, a blog - a chance for me to state a case on a topic of interest and you, my readers (and probably my friends) to respond in kind. Consider this the raucous dinner party we don't have nearly often enough.

So I hope you'll stick around, check this out regularly (I'm going to try and post very regularly), and enjoy the Legal Pop.